# private-gpt vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | private-gpt | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in LLM Integration | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 57 614 | 117 554 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 | +5 195 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.1 · 18 Jun 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 81/100 for private-gpt, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for private-gpt.

If you want the quickest setup, private-gpt is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 195 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [private-gpt](https://selfhost.directory/project/private-gpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/private-gpt.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/private-gpt-vs-tradingagents