# private-gpt vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | private-gpt | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in LLM Integration | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 57 614 ✓ | 1 360 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.1 · 18 Jun 2026 | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

private-gpt scores 81/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for private-gpt.

If you want the quickest setup, private-gpt is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

private-gpt is growing faster right now (+88 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [private-gpt](https://selfhost.directory/project/private-gpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/private-gpt.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/private-gpt-vs-tapflow