pr-agentvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pr-agent | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Code Review | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 687 | 13 312 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +544 | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.49.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 77/100 for pr-agent, so it is the safer default.
pr-agent ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; pr-agent needs more configuration.
pr-agent details →Stash details →