# pr-agent vs ReadMeABook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pr-agent | ReadMeABook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Code Review | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 682 ✓ | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +539 ✓ | +63 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.49.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

pr-agent scores 77/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.

pr-agent ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for ReadMeABook.

If you want the quickest setup, pr-agent is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

pr-agent is growing faster right now (+539 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pr-agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent.md)
- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pr-agent-vs-readmeabook