# PowerSync Service vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PowerSync Service | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 397 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.27.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WBO scores 61/100 against 49/100 for PowerSync Service, so it is the safer default.

PowerSync Service ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; PowerSync Service needs more configuration.

WBO is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PowerSync Service](https://selfhost.directory/project/powersync-service) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/powersync-service.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/powersync-service-vs-wbo