PowerSync ServicevsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PowerSync Service | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 397 | 4 115 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.27.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 49/100 for PowerSync Service, so it is the safer default.
PowerSync Service ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
If you want the quickest setup, Apache Tika is easier to run; PowerSync Service needs more configuration.
Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
PowerSync Service details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep PowerSync Service, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with