# PostHog vs QGIS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PostHog | QGIS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in Analytics | #1 of 8 in Geospatial |
| GitHub stars | 40 497 ✓ | 14 731 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +588 ✓ | +110 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3503 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | agent-skills-v0.3893.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | final-4_2_3 · 28 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

PostHog and QGIS score the same (81/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

PostHog ships more often: 3503 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS.

If you want the quickest setup, QGIS is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.

PostHog is growing faster right now (+588 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PostHog](https://selfhost.directory/project/posthog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/posthog.md)
- [QGIS](https://selfhost.directory/project/qgis) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qgis.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/posthog-vs-qgis