PostgRESTvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PostgREST | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in API | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 27 733 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 11 |
| Latest release | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Haskell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 79/100 for PostgREST, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).
PostgREST details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep PostgREST, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with