PostgRESTvsSSH & Web Terminal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PostgREST | SSH & Web Terminal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in API | #30 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 27 734 | 542 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 19 |
| Latest release | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Haskell | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for SSH & Web Terminal.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; SSH & Web Terminal needs more configuration.
PostgREST is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
PostgREST details →SSH & Web Terminal details →
Swap a project
Keep PostgREST, compare it with
Keep SSH & Web Terminal, compare it with