PostgRESTvsSnipe-IT
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PostgREST | Snipe-IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in API | #1 of 15 in Asset Management |
| GitHub stars | 27 734 | 15 111 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 17 |
| Latest release | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 | v8.8.3 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Haskell | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 77/100 for Snipe-IT, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Snipe-IT.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; Snipe-IT needs more configuration.
Snipe-IT is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).
PostgREST details →Snipe-IT details →
Swap a project
Keep PostgREST, compare it with
Keep Snipe-IT, compare it with