# PostgREST vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PostgREST | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in API | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 27 734 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Haskell | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

PostgREST scores 79/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.

PostgREST is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PostgREST](https://selfhost.directory/project/postgrest) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/postgrest.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/postgrest-vs-scada-lts