PostgRESTvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PostgREST | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in API | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 27 734 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Haskell | Java |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
PostgREST is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
PostgREST details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep PostgREST, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with