PortainervsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Portainer | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 44 in Container Management | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 737 | 5 277 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +188 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 27 |
| Latest release | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Zlib | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
Portainer scores 77/100 against 71/100 for Umbraco CMS, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for Portainer.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Portainer is growing faster right now (+188 stars in 30 days).
Portainer details →Umbraco CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Portainer, compare it with
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with