# Portainer vs Apache Tika

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Portainer | Apache Tika |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 38 736 ✓ | 4 114 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 ✓ | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Zlib | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Portainer scores 77/100 against 68/100 for Apache Tika, so it is the safer default.

Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.

If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.

Portainer is growing faster right now (+187 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Portainer](https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer.md)
- [Apache Tika](https://selfhost.directory/project/tika) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tika.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/portainer-vs-tika