# Portainer vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Portainer | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 737 | 114 248 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +188 | +3 539 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Zlib | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 77/100 for Portainer, so it is the safer default.

Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 539 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Portainer](https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/portainer-vs-supabase