PortainervsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Portainer | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 44 in Container Management | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 38 736 | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 13 |
| Latest release | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Zlib | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 77/100 for Portainer, so it is the safer default.
Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.
Portainer details →SRS details →
Swap a project
Keep Portainer, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with