# Portainer vs SparkyFitness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Portainer | SparkyFitness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 44 in Container Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 38 736 ✓ | 6 501 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 | +401 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 26 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.9.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Zlib | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Portainer scores 77/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.

SparkyFitness ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for Portainer.

If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.

SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+401 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Portainer](https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer.md)
- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/portainer-vs-sparkyfitness