# Portainer vs ryot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Portainer | ryot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 44 in Container Management | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 38 737 ✓ | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +188 ✓ | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Zlib | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Portainer scores 77/100 against 64/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.

Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.

If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.

Portainer is growing faster right now (+188 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Portainer](https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer.md)
- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/portainer-vs-ryot