Portainervsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Portainer | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 44 in Container Management | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 38 737 | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +188 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 2 |
| Latest release | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Zlib | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Portainer scores 77/100 against 64/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
Portainer is growing faster right now (+188 stars in 30 days).
Portainer details →ryot details →
Swap a project
Keep Portainer, compare it with
Keep ryot, compare it with