PortainervsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Portainer | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 737 | 44 998 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +188 | +1 625 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 34 |
| Latest release | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Zlib | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 77/100 for Portainer, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for Portainer.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).
Portainer details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Portainer, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with