# portabase vs Technitium DNS Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | portabase | Technitium DNS Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Backup Management | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 1 860 | 10 238 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +95 | +257 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 64 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.35.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v15.6.2 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Technitium DNS Server scores 77/100 against 60/100 for portabase, so it is the safer default.

portabase ships more often: 64 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Technitium DNS Server.

If you want the quickest setup, Technitium DNS Server is easier to run; portabase needs more configuration.

Technitium DNS Server is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [portabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase.md)
- [Technitium DNS Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/technitium-dns-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/technitium-dns-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/portabase-vs-technitium-dns-server