# portabase vs Shinobi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | portabase | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Backup Management | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 1 860 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +95 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 64 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.35.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Shinobi scores 66/100 against 60/100 for portabase, so it is the safer default.

portabase ships more often: 64 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.

If you want the quickest setup, portabase is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

portabase is growing faster right now (+95 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [portabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase.md)
- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/portabase-vs-shinobi