# portabase vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | portabase | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Backup Management | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 1 860 | 35 784 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +95 | +859 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 64 ✓ | 28 |
| Latest release | 1.35.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 60/100 for portabase, so it is the safer default.

portabase ships more often: 64 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+859 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [portabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/portabase-vs-seaweedfs