portabasevsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| portabase | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Backup Management | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 1 860 | 35 784 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +95 | +859 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 64 | 28 |
| Latest release | 1.35.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 60/100 for portabase, so it is the safer default.
portabase ships more often: 64 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+859 stars in 30 days).
portabase details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep portabase, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with