portavssglang
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| porta | sglang | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #122 of 166 in Developer Tools | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 211 | 38 343 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 935 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 17 |
| Latest release | v0.16.2 · 9 Sept 2026 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sglang scores 86/100 against 42/100 for porta, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, porta is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
sglang is growing faster right now (+1 935 stars in 30 days).
porta details →sglang details →