portavsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| porta | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #122 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 211 | 45 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 35 |
| Latest release | v0.16.2 · 9 Sept 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 42/100 for porta, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for porta.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
porta details →Reactive Resume details →