# polar vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | polar | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Billing | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 10 437 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +158 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

polar scores 71/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.

polar is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/polar-vs-windows-arm