# polar vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | polar | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Billing | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 10 436 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 71/100 for polar, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.

## Details

- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/polar-vs-tube-archivist