# polar vs SparkyFitness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | polar | SparkyFitness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Billing | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 10 436 ✓ | 6 503 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +392 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

polar scores 71/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.

SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.

If you want the quickest setup, SparkyFitness is easier to run; polar needs more configuration.

SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)
- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/polar-vs-sparkyfitness