polarvsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| polar | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Billing | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 10 436 | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 2 |
| Latest release | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
polar scores 71/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
ryot ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.
If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; polar needs more configuration.
polar is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep polar, compare it with
Keep ryot, compare it with