polarvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| polar | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Billing | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 436 | 45 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 34 |
| Latest release | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 71/100 for polar, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; polar needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
polar details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep polar, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with