pocketpawvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pocketpaw | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #52 of 120 in AI Assistant | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 902 | 4 114 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.4.18 · 29 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 48/100 for pocketpaw, so it is the safer default.
pocketpaw ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
If you want the quickest setup, pocketpaw is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.
Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+15 stars in 30 days).
pocketpaw details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep pocketpaw, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with