# pocketpaw vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pocketpaw | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #52 of 120 in AI Assistant | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 904 | 13 309 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +299 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.4.18 · 29 Apr 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 48/100 for pocketpaw, so it is the safer default.

pocketpaw ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pocketpaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/pocketpaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pocketpaw.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pocketpaw-vs-stash