pocketpawvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pocketpaw | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #52 of 120 in AI Assistant | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 902 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +298 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.4.18 · 29 Apr 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 48/100 for pocketpaw, so it is the safer default.
pocketpaw ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
Stash is growing faster right now (+298 stars in 30 days).
pocketpaw details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep pocketpaw, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with