# pocketpaw vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pocketpaw | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #52 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 901 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.4.18 · 29 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 48/100 for pocketpaw, so it is the safer default.

pocketpaw ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, pocketpaw is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pocketpaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/pocketpaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pocketpaw.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pocketpaw-vs-sdnext