pocketpawvssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pocketpaw | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #52 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 894 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.4.18 · 29 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 48/100 for pocketpaw, so it is the safer default.
pocketpaw ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, pocketpaw is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
pocketpaw details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep pocketpaw, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with