pocketpawvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pocketpaw | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #52 of 120 in AI Assistant | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 904 | 45 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 34 |
| Latest release | v0.4.18 · 29 Apr 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 48/100 for pocketpaw, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for pocketpaw.
If you want the quickest setup, pocketpaw is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
pocketpaw details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep pocketpaw, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with