# PluXml vs Umbraco CMS

> Two self-hosted [Content Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/content-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PluXml | Umbraco CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #34 of 42 in Content Management | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 233 | 5 278 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.8.23 · 23 Jul 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 48/100 for PluXml, so it is the safer default.

Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for PluXml.

If you want the quickest setup, PluXml is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PluXml](https://selfhost.directory/project/pluxml) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pluxml.md)
- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pluxml-vs-umbraco-cms