# Playerr vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Playerr | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #17 of 23 in Gaming | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 180 | 47 723 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.4.8 · 3 Feb 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 45/100 for Playerr, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Playerr needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Playerr](https://selfhost.directory/project/playerr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/playerr.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/playerr-vs-text-generation-webui