# Plausible Analytics vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Plausible Analytics | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 21 in Web analytics | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 29 711 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +504 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Plausible Analytics scores 81/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Plausible Analytics.

If you want the quickest setup, Plausible Analytics is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Plausible Analytics is growing faster right now (+504 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Plausible Analytics](https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/plausible-analytics-vs-tube-archivist