# Platypush vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Platypush | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #52 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 317 | 114 297 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 549 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.3.17 · 11 Jan 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 53/100 for Platypush, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Platypush is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 549 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Platypush](https://selfhost.directory/project/platypush) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/platypush.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/platypush-vs-supabase