platformvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| platform | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #110 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 242 | 45 023 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 622 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 34 |
| Latest release | — | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 48/100 for platform, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for platform.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; platform needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).
platform details →Reactive Resume details →