# Plant-it vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Plant-it | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Home Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 376 | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +83 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.0.1 · 20 Jan 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 52/100 for Plant-it, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Plant-it.

If you want the quickest setup, Plant-it is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Plant-it](https://selfhost.directory/project/plant-it) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plant-it.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/plant-it-vs-tube-archivist