# plain-app vs shotsync

> Two self-hosted [LocalSend alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/localsend), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | plain-app | shotsync |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync | #57 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 7 083 ✓ | 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +323 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.3.25 · 11 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Kotlin | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

plain-app scores 69/100 against 47/100 for shotsync, so it is the safer default.

plain-app ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for shotsync.

If you want the quickest setup, plain-app is easier to run; shotsync needs more configuration.

plain-app is growing faster right now (+323 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [plain-app](https://selfhost.directory/project/plain-app) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plain-app.md)
- [shotsync](https://selfhost.directory/project/shotsync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shotsync.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/plain-app-vs-shotsync