PixelFedvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PixelFed | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 7 131 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
PixelFed scores 64/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
PixelFed ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Wastebin.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; PixelFed needs more configuration.
PixelFed details →Wastebin details →