# PixelFed vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PixelFed | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 7 131 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | PHP | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

PixelFed scores 64/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

PixelFed ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; PixelFed needs more configuration.

PixelFed is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PixelFed](https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pixelfed-vs-uusec-waf