# PixelFed vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PixelFed | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 7 131 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

PixelFed scores 64/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

PixelFed ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; PixelFed needs more configuration.

PixelFed is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PixelFed](https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pixelfed-vs-unbagrnd