# PixelFed vs supabase-automated-self-host

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PixelFed | supabase-automated-self-host |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 7 131 ✓ | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

PixelFed scores 64/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

PixelFed ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.

If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; PixelFed needs more configuration.

PixelFed is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PixelFed](https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed.md)
- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pixelfed-vs-supabase-automated-self-host