# PixelFed vs spotify-saver

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PixelFed | spotify-saver |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #35 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 7 130 ✓ | 169 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.7.5 · 23 Nov 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PixelFed scores 64/100 against 44/100 for spotify-saver, so it is the safer default.

PixelFed ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for spotify-saver.

If you want the quickest setup, spotify-saver is easier to run; PixelFed needs more configuration.

PixelFed is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PixelFed](https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed.md)
- [spotify-saver](https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pixelfed-vs-spotify-saver