PixelFedvsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PixelFed | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 7 131 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Java |
Which one should you pick?
PixelFed scores 64/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
PixelFed ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; PixelFed needs more configuration.
PixelFed is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
PixelFed details →qm-music details →